Tags
Conspiracy, foreign mercenaries, foreign-backed terrorists, Iraq, Iraqi army, ISIL, ISIS, Mosul, Plots, Syrian borders, Terrorism By Proxy, Terrorisme, Terrorists, Terrorists Gangs, USA Military, USA plots, War by Proxy, War crimes, War Criminals, War Strategy, Washington's Plan, Zionist conspiracy, Zionist project

ISIS (ISIL) mercenaries, a bunch of pervert cannibal butchers takfirists, as cowards they shoot behind, slaughtering unarmed people in Irak
~ By Finian Cunningham (PTV)
Are we witnessing a new era of cooperation between the US and Iran, prompted by the crisis gripping Iraq?
That’s quite a turnaround, considering Washington continues to accuse Iran of sponsoring international terrorism and secretly harboring ambitions to build
nuclear weapons.
America’s top diplomat John Kerry says the US is “now open” to working with Iran in a bid to halt the collapse of the Baghdad government, as formerly Al Qaeda-linked militants take over large parts of the country and are poised within 60 kilometers of the Iraqi capital.
The seemingly dramatic shift in US policy towards Iran is underlined by Washington’s ally Britain saying also this week that it is planning to re-open the British embassy in Tehran after years of closure. UK Foreign Minister William Hague said the move reflected the “warming
relations” between Iran and the West over the Iraq crisis.
The New York Times reports that the West and Iran are trying to find “common security interests” in Iraq. The paper claims that both sides share a “common enemy” – the militants of the so-called Islamic State
of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
The New York Times’ claim is a travesty of the truth. The extremist ISIS group in its current form is a creation of US covert support, along with Washington’s NATO and Persian Gulf Arab allies.
The ideology of ISIS is a reflection of its Wahhabi sponsors among the Saudi and Qatari monarchies, both of which have plied over $10 billion into supporting the ISIS and other extremist groups, such as Jabhat al Nusra.
Now Washington and its mouthpieces are re-writing recent history by trying to make out that the ISIS and its terrorist ilk are “enemies of the West”.
Only weeks ago, these terrorist mercenaries were filmed operating in Syria with newly supplied US anti-tank TOW missiles.
So, the idea that the ISIS is a “common enemy” to the US and Iran is an absurd false premise. ISIS is a proxy for Washington and its Western and Arab allies to wage covert war in the region for strategic objectives. That proxy force has been directed primarily at destabilizing Syria with the objective of regime change against the
Damascus government of President Bashar al Assad.
However, one of the other main Western objectives of regime change in Syria over the past three years is to weaken Syria’s key regional ally, Iran.
That perspective of underlying Western hostility towards Iran needs to be kept firmly in focus as we assess the current turmoil in Iraq. Washington is not extending a hand of cooperation towards Iran. It is rather more a poisoned chalice.
It is significant that the seemingly explosive advances made by ISIS in Iraq follows two developments: the nearing outright military defeat of this Western proxy in neighboring Syria; and the stunning election victory of President Assad earlier this month, when he won the backing of nearly 89 per cent of the Syrian electorate.
Both developments have effectively put paid to NATO, Arab and Israeli attempts to subvert Syria with their more than three-year campaign of covert terrorism in that country.
Notice, too, how Syria has suddenly dropped from the Western media news cycles. This signals that Washington and its allies have realized that they cannot prosecute
their objectives of regime change in Syria and, secondarily, Iran.
Directing covert war to Iraq seems to be Washington’s Plan B to embroil and undermine Iran by some other means.
Western diplomatic sources are saying that Washington is not contemplating military cooperation with Iran in securing Iraq. But what might be on the cards is for Washington to countenance “Iran sending in troops to Iraq” to help shore up the government of Prime
Minister Nouri al Maliki.
That does not sound like “cooperation”. Rather, it sounds like Washington is preparing a quagmire for Iran in Iraq. One can envisage Iranian troops going into Iraq with the best of intentions of trying to secure the country and to quell the ISIS onslaught. Meanwhile, the US and its NATO and Arab allies will continue their covert support of their ISIS proxy and in that way drag Iran into a crippling counterinsurgency war.
The most effective way to end the violence in Iraq is for Washington and its allies to stop fuelling the proxy ISIS mercenaries and their war of terror in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere in the region. That Washington and its allies are not contemplating the effective solution shows that their purported concerns for Iraq are not genuine, and nor
are their “friendly” overtures towards Iran.
By Finian Cunningham – June 17, 2014
~
Sources:
Press TV
NSNBC
SFP – 18/6/2014
.
.
.
Iran knows better than to collaborate with those that support and back Takfiri head hacking militants.
The US Sponsored Sectarian “Civil War” is a “War of Aggression”. And that aggression includes Syria and Iran, make NO mistake!
http://www.globalresearch.ca/iraq-the-us-sponsored-sectarian-civil-war-is-a-war-of-aggression-the-supreme-international-crime/5387472
You see, I never trust BBC and it’s political articles are all bleak:
ISIS militants with US passports?
http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27844749
Pingback: ISIS: Washington’s Honey Trap for Iran in Iraq | Uprootedpalestinians's Blog
There is nobody in DC, London or Brussels who is smart enough suck Iran into such a truly stupid action. Persia was old and wise in geopolitical intrigue and action long before The Divine Julius conquered Gaul. ‘Western’ geopolitical planning and projection look forward, tactically, maybe 5 years, and strategically 25-30 years at best while Persia looks forward both tactically and strategically two to five centuries. It pays to remember that chess was invented by the Persians. I’d not be surprised if Iran, Iraq and Syria put together a coalition for military co-operation for the purposes of kicking the sh*t out of a common enemy, without getting the politics all muddled in the process. Syria’s Air Force is already striking ISIS/ISIL targets in Iraq at Iraqi request, SAA is across the Euphrates and moving eastward so, if the Iraqi military can get its fecal matter together, ISIS/ISIL is between the hammer and the anvil, a very bad place to be, indeed. I am, however, disappointed that al Maliki asked for USSA military support of any kind, which leads me to suspect that he is not nearly as smart as his country deserves in a leader.
we are no fans of al-Maliki but you sure that al-Maliki has asked the satans? If we remember correctly al-Maliki went to Russia to buy arms!
true friend of course Iran will not fall in the trap
but Iran is the only country willing to protect MUSLIMS and the Shrines
besides His Excellency has spoken for the first time and it is intelligence + wisdom and we know that
http://aydinlikdaily.com/Columnist-Detail/Iraqiness-Not-Sectarianism-Strengthening-In-Iraq/2964#.U6LAN3YZ5rA
Fikret Akfırat
Iraqi-ness, Not Sectarianism, Strengthening in Iraq
Published 17-06-2014 The Mosul invasion begun with a very intentional psychological operation. The propaganda goes, “Shia-Sunni conflicts will take place, Iraq will be divided into three, the Kurdish state will be created, the northern Iraqi- Kurdish area turned out the most successful.” These are the operation’s targets, but none are realistic or implementable.
There is no Shia-Sunni conflict…………………..
+Turkey’sgov Insanity shows no sign of stopping! How these idiots keep showing their face is shameful to say the least
——————————————————-
Turkey’s Bans Media Coverage of ISIS Kidnapping in Mosul – Deputy Foreign Minister “Nobody Was Kidnapped”
by nsnbc
nsnbc : The Ankara 9th Criminal High Court banned media reports on the “kidnapping” of Turkish consular staff in Mosul, Iraq, by ISIL. The censorship comes after a statement by Turkish Deputy Foreign Minister Naci Koru, who said “we don’t believe that 49 people were taken hostage” raised red flags about a possible false flag scenario.