, , , , , , , , , , , ,


Unhappy with the results of the fight against DAESH-ISIL mercenary terrorists, Barack Obama has reportedly ordered a review of America’s strategy, which include the removal of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, his Government and National Army.

We, the Editors of “the real SyrianFreePress.NETwork“, have never believed for a single moment that Obama’s (and his allies) intentions were different than to attack and overthrow the legitimate government of President Bashar al-Assad, and that the war to DAESH (…terrorist organization that is documented to have been created by the US itself, the same as Al-Qaeda…) was just the final excuse to slowly intrude and attack Syria and the Syrian people, “cornerstone “of the Arab resistance and barrier to the oil barons’ projects (SFP).

RT, 13/11/2014 ~ In a report published byCNN, numerous senior officials and diplomats said Obama’s national security team has conducted multiple meetings over the last week to discuss the situation in the Middle East. Specifically, they are trying to determine just what kind of action may need to be taken in Syria in order to defeat DAESH (IS, or ISIS/ISIL)

“The president has asked us to look again at how this fits together,” one senior official told the network. “The long running Syria problem is now compounded by the reality that to genuinely defeat ISIL, we need not only a defeat in Iraq but a defeat in Syria.”

According to CNN, the White House is considering a variety of proposals, each with their own obstacles to overcome. The Obama administration has requested $500 million to train and equip what it calls moderate rebels in Syria, but so far it has yet to find adequate partners and has not started vetting potential groups.

There have been discussions of a no-fly zone near the border of Turkey and Syria, but these talks have also yet to bear fruit.

However, the unnamed officials said the US is increasingly becoming convinced that it cannot tackle the Islamic State in Iraq without also incorporating Syria into its strategy. And that strategy, officials said, means dealing with rebels battling Assad as well as criticism from Arab partners that the administration has been too soft on the Syrian government.

“Developments on the ground have caused the national security team to collectively conclude we may not have time for Iraq first,” a senior official told CNN. “In an ideal world you would drive ISIL out of Iraq and pivot to Syria. But if by then the moderate opposition has been smacked and ISIL is still there, that doesn’t help.”

Secretary of State John Kerry has apparently held talks with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, and Russia about potentially transferring power away from Assad. Iran has reportedly proposed constitutional reforms in Syria to be followed by elections, but it is unclear how much traction this idea has.

There has also been talk of implementing ceasefires between Assad and the rebels, which would help the administration train groups to fight the Islamic State more easily and create time for any potential political transition, which could take months.



(Posted by: The Old Sniper)


SOURCE: RT News ~ 13/11/2014
the real SyrianFreePress.NETwork updated at

Versione in Italiano su TG24Siria


NOTE: The contents of this article/speech are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The team and the editor of SyrianFreePress.NETwork do not necessarily subscribe every point of view expressed and are not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article.