al-Yarmouk Camp, British, British Government, British intelligence, British mercenaries, British military, British Terrorists, Daesh, False Flags, foreign mercenaries, foreign-backed insurgency, foreign-backed terrorists, ISIS, Jabhat al-Nusra, Plots, Syrian Free Press, Terror Agents, Terrorism By Proxy, Terrorisme, Terrorists Gangs, Turkey, Turkey’s intelligence agency, Turkish intelligence, Turkish plots, U.S.-Zionist plots, US regime, USA, USA plots, War by Proxy, War crimes, War Criminals, War on Syria, War Strategy
The British government peculiarly recently ‘announced’ in the ‘media’ not in the British Parliament, which was by no co-incidence shut down for ‘elections’ that day that British soldiers were going to try to ‘train’ what would really become a NATO ground invasion force for Syria launched from Turkey.
We asked the obvious question (in writing) to which there has inevitably yet been no legal written response from the British government, over what legal grounds there are to train what in legal terms are terrorists in Turkey, who the British government could not train in Britain.
Obviously there are not and will never be any legal grounds for British soldiers to train terrorists in Turkey etc.
All the NATO War propaganda you read in the MSM (much of which is thoughtlessly regurgitated by the so called ‘alternative’ news media) is searching for a false pretext and designed to give a false impression that NATO act within society’s rule of law, which frankly they have never done.
It isn’t just that the US and Turkey are getting ahead of themselves as NATO and their Kurdish propagandists imply.
What has really been going on is that it is likely that the US and Turkey are not keen to launch a long ground invasion etc of Syria, without their European NATO ‘allies’ standing alongside because of the total absence of any legal cover over what is clearly illegal.
The nature and timing of the British announcement however strongly indicates that there is now or was a false flag in the offing over Syria.
False Flags serve the purpose of fast forwarding military action etc in the hope that any question over legal grounds that they know they do not have, is lost in the media storm that accompanies such events.
In legal terms, it is of course self-evident (for example) that the British High Court would have difficulty legally refusing an injunction on an ‘unless order’ against the British government, who have failed without lawful excuse to provide any legal grounds in writing for ‘training’ terrorists in Turkey, they obviously cannot legally train in Britain.
In practical terms the British government incredibly purport to propose to militarily ‘train’ people in the use of lethal force outside any European legal scrutiny.
It is also clear that the British announcement involved considerable far from legal ducking and diving going on regarding the old canard of ‘plausible deniability’, although it is impossible to understand how the British Prime Minister could even begin to claim the British Parliament was formally informed.
There has been absolutely no discussion in the British Parliament over British soldiers going to Turkey to ‘train’ terrorists to invade Syria.
It is nevertheless obvious that the entire British Parliament are trying to circumvent any European legal process to actually invade Syria.
The fact that a British announcement was very quietly made in the media, outside of any Parliamentary process (Parliament was ‘prorogued’ on March 26th 2015 and ‘dissolved’ on March 30th 2015 so just Minister’s retain ‘power’) raises a very many questions.
The State Opening of a new British Parliament does not take place until May 27th 2015.
There is no obvious reason to make such an ‘announcement’ except for the purposes of criminal deceit by the entire British Parliament, who would all struggle to ‘debate’ such blatant criminality, as indeed their ‘news’ media propagandists would have ‘reporting’ it.
Times have moved on from the Iraq War and the NATO ‘news’ media trying to silence all truth.
In fact what the British government are trying to do (it was Roland Dumas who exposed the illegal overthrow of the Syrian government was a British plot) is find somewhere outside any European legal scrutiny of any kind, to launch an illegal ground and air invasion of Syria.
The British government have legally had their fingers badly burnt over the illegal Iraq War.
The timing and manner of the British announcement is so peculiar that it strongly suggests NATO et al may well be looking at a serious false flag operation.
The British Parliament of all ‘political’ flavours obviously know they cannot produce any legal grounds for what is really about launching a NATO-led ground invasion from Turkey.
The announcements do co-incide with the Qatari faction of Hamas who like Abbas’ Fatah have long had Israel arresting or assassinating anyone within Hamas who challenges their ‘authority’ busy helping NATO in Yarmouk and in the case of Hamas in Idlib too.
The plotting includes trying to put greater pressure on President Assad in Damascus (via Yarmouk, which should largely fail) while ridiculously trying to pretend a de-facto ‘government’ of white-washed terrorists can set up ‘state’ in Idlib to call for help from NATO.
What is certainly clear is that NATO has not and will not voluntarily give up any ambition to overthrow the Syrian government, because NATO needs entire control of the Middle East to illegally remain in the Middle East.
R E L A T E D ~ 12 April 2015 :
TURKISH ‘INTELLIGENCE’ WARNS OF DAMASCUS TERROR THREAT IN BID FOR EUROPE TO JOIN US & TURKEY INVASION OF SYRIA
The simultaneous pronouncements that the US and Turkey are putting their overt terrorist ‘training’ scheme ‘on hold’ until May while Turkish ‘intelligence’ wants to blame any terror attacks on the Syrian government only proves that the European arm of NATO don’t have any legal grounds to be involved in the launch of any illegal ground invasion of Syria from Turkey.
It is obvious that Turkey blaming the Syrian government for any false flag terror attacks which is a very hard sell, is only designed to try and find a false pretext for the European arm of NATO to join a US & Turkish ground invasion of Syria.
The latest ‘pronouncement’ from Turkish ‘intelligence’ comes ‘hot on the heels’ of the fact that the US, UK, France and Jordan by no co-incidence refused to identify and list those they call the ‘Islamic State’ at the UN.
It transpired that the Syrian administration trained 5000 prisoners to carry out [terrorist] acts in Turkey; 2400 of whom have [already] been released [from prison].
A communication sent by [Turkey’s intelligence agency] MIT to the Interior Ministry [of Turkey] reports the planned entry of prisoners into Turkey across the Cilvegozu and Oncupinar [border] gates and via Beirut. The prisoners, who received training in Damascus, Lattakia and Tartous, will be carrying out [terrorist] acts after dispersing across 12 provinces, including Istanbul, Mersin, Adana, Gaziantep, Sanliurfa, Hatay and Iskenderun
The problem that the NATO ‘news’ media in Europe have with peddling a Turkey ‘Terror’ canard is that it is as impossible to rehabilitate any public image of Erdogan the Terrible in Europe as it is to now white-wash the image of any of their terrorists in Syria in Europe.
The completely unhinged ravings of Erdogan in Turkey do not translate well into European ‘news’ media propaganda, which is why they are by and large ignored in Europe.
A false flag terror attack in Turkey to try and find a way in for the European arm of NATO to get on board for an invasion of Syria, would actually only serve to highlight in Europe the fact that in legal terms it is the Turkish government who have been openly supporting lethally armed terrorists to try and illegally overthrow the Syrian government.
The idea that the Syrian government would launch terror attacks in Turkey is a very hard sell for European NATO ‘news’ media propagandists, not least because unlike NATO ‘governments’ and ‘news’ media the Syrian government have been entirely consistent about the criminality of the foreign backed lethally armed terrorists trying to illegally overthrow them.
The alleged ‘arrest’ of Turkish soldiers supposedly stopping intelligence trucks entering Syria is supposed to give a public impression that the Turkish government can legally come and go from Syria as they please, doing whatever they want.
The ‘arrests’ are solely for public consumption since the Turkish government openly and to great fanfare across ‘news’ media in the US & Europe provided free passage to Iraqi Kurdish Peshmerga to cross into Syria via Turkey when all were trying to ridiculously claim it was legal to transfer lethal weapons from Europe that went to Iraq on to Syria via Turkey.
It really is impossible for NATO’s European ‘news’ media propagandists to re-habilitate the public image of Erdogan the Terrible, while the British and other European governments would nevertheless still have to overcome the very real obstacle of a legal challenge regarding the legal grounds they would rely on to invade Syria.
The elections in both Britain with a State Opening of another Parliament on May 27th 2015 along with Turkish elections on June 7th 2015, will not produce any visible shift in NATO ‘politics’ towards society’s rule of law.
The fact British elections are rigged in any real sense to produce a corporate government is without doubt, because there is no consequential difference between any of the ‘political’ parties who will all back war while trying to keep up the odd inconsequential public appearance to suggest otherwise.
What really exposes the underlying fraud of all NATO ‘political parties’ is that there is not a ‘political’ party who does not try to dishonestly claim that a ‘political’ vote on war is superior to society’s rule of law.
No ‘political’ party in Britain has ever launched a legal challenge over wars they might claim to oppose, while people who really do care about human life do uphold society’s rule of law by bringing those legal challenges.
Until ‘political parties’ in Europe are forced to first uphold and abide by society’s rule of law at all times (which should never be conflated with their corporate legislation) they serve no legitimate or justifiable purpose of any kind.
NATO goes to any length to try and disguise the simple legal position is NATO has never had any legal grounds for being in the Middle East.
SOURCES: Brian Haw, 11/4/2015 Brian Haw, 12/4/2015 Submitted by Cem Ertür The real SyrianFreePress.NETwork at
NOTE: The contents of the articles, speeches or comments on this page are of sole responsibility of their authors. The team and the editorial staff of SyrianFreePress do not necessarily subscribe every point of view expressed and are not responsible for any inaccurate, incorrect or offensive statement in this article. Complaints and corrections (verifiable) will be welcomed and accepted. Copyright owners can notify their claims to us, and the verified contents will be removed.
SCROLL DOWN TO READ OR LEAVE COMMENTS