Ayn al-Arab, Centre for Military Research in Jemraya, Collective Security Treaty Organization, Conspiracy, Daesh, foreign-backed terrorists, FSA, General Valéri Guérassimov, Intelligence Services, ISIL, ISIS, Israel, Israeli intelligence, Israeli occupation forces, Jabhat al-Nusra, Kazakhstan, Kirghizistan, Kobane, Kurdish, Kurds, MiG-31, Patriot Missiles, Plots, Russia, Russian Defense System, Russo-Syrian military Commission, Syrian Air Forces, Syrian Arab Army, Syrian Army, Syrian Resistance, Tadjikistan, Terrorism By Proxy, Turkey, Turkish intelligence, Turkish plots, USA, USA-Russia, War by Proxy, War on Syria, War Strategy, Zionist conspiracy, Zionist entity
Is the Russian army beginning to engage in Syria?
Not realy, we do not believe it, but…
A profound and significant change has just occurred in the Levant – the Russian army has begun to engage against terrorism in Syria. Although Russia has been absent from the international scene since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and although it is moving with care, it has just created a Russo-Syrian Commission, has begun supplying weapons, sharing intelligence, and sending advisors. All of this is more or less coordinated with the White House.
After having negotiated a regional alliance against the Islamic Emirate which implied Saudi Arabia, Syria and Turkey, Russia suddenly had to abandon its strategy after the Turkish turn-around.
Ankara has in fact decided to break off its ties with Moscow, and has cancelled, without genuine motive, the contract for the gas pipe-line Turkish Stream, created, in partenership with Ukraine, an international Islamic Brigade intended to destabilise Crimea .
It has also come to the help of the Islamic Emirate in their fight against the Kurds of the PKK and the YPG.
In the same way, the White House has been obliged to change its own strategy after the manœuvers by General John Allen, who agreed to help President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to create a « security zone »for the Islamic Emirate in Northern Syria .
Finally, Moscow and Washington have coordinated:
- the removal of Patriot missiles stationed in Turkey
- the creation of a Russo-Syrian military Commission.
The end of the no-fly zone
The Patriot missiles had been installed by NATO in Turkey as from January 2013, in order to prevent the Syrian Air Force from deploying on the frontier.
As a result, the jihadists of the al-Nusra Front (al-Qaïda) were able to seize the North of the country, and as from the summer of 2014, this no-fly zone was occupied by the Islamic Emirate.
Thus, during the battle of Kobane, the Syrian Air Force were unable to bomb the Islamic Emirate, and Syria was obliged to attempt a land attack to save the city. Since it was unable to advance the last thirty kilometres, the Atlantist Press presented the Kurdish forces of the YPG as being independent of Damascus, although the Syrian Arab Republic had supplied it with weapons and was paying its soldiers.
The Patriot missiles, initially deployed by Germany and Holland, are today German and Spanish. They will first of all be revised and modernised, then redeployed in Lithuania, at the Russian frontier.
The entrance of the Russian army into the war against Syria
Although Russia had abstained from participating in military operations since the beginning of the conflict, it has now created a Russo-Syrian Military Commission.
And yet, NATO had organised all the events concerned in what was called the « Arab spring », including the war against Syria, and coordinated foreign jihadist groups and their Libyan and Syrian collaborators, called « rebels », from the Turkish base in Izmir , now also the location of LancCom (command of the land troops of the 28 member states of the Atlantic Alliance).
Within a few weeks, many military advisors arrived in Damascus.
Six Mikoyan-Gourevitch MiG-31’s were delivered.
These planes are the best interceptors in the world. They had been bought in 2007, but the contract had been frozen. Their delivery is not affected by the arms embargo, since they can not be used in operations concerning the maintenance of law and order, but only for national defence, in this case, possible incursions by Israël or Turkey. Under various pretexts, these two states acted many time during the war to support the jihadists whenever they were in difficulty.
So, on the 30th January 2013, Tsahal (the Zionist Occupation Army, SFP) bombed the Centre for Military Research in Jemraya, under the pretext of destroying weapons that were destined for Hezbollah.
In fact, the attack was intended to destroy a communications brief-case captured by the Syrian Arab Army, containing NATO satellite data, before they were able to decipher it .
The operation had been commanded by the Israeli Air Force in coordination with the Free Syrian Army, which in turn was directed by officers of the French Foreign Legion under the supervision of NATO’s LandCom.
Simultaneously, and for the first time, the Russian army has just supplied satellite images to Syria. This decision, awaited for five years, inverses the military situation. Indeed, so far the jihadists have often escaped the Syrian Arab Army thanks to satellite images supplied by NATO in real time. Even though, over a six-month period, it would seem that NATO no longer shares its intelligence with the Islamic Emirate, but only with the al-Nusra Front (al-Qaïda).
Finally, the Russian military advisors possess a wealth of information which they use in order to study the possibility of an international deployment under banner of the UNO. They have to present a report to the Kremlin which would also study the possibility of a Russian operation as well as a joint operation by the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).
The CSTO will be meeting in Douchanbe, Tadjikistan, on the 15th September. A deployment by the CSTO had aleady been envisaged, in June 2012, during the preparation for the « Geneva Conference 1 » . Indeed, this military alliance includes three states with a Muslim population – Kazakhstan, Kirghizistan, and Tadjikistan, who are better prepared than Russia to fight terrorists who claim to be Islamist. However, at the time, the CSTO had no agreement with the UNO to carry out peace operations. This situation was resolved on the 28th September 2012 – it could also be applied as well in Afghanistan as in Syria .
The limits of the cooperation between the Kremlin and the White House
In any event, the cooperation between the Kremlin and the White House has its limits – Russia wants to eradicate the jihadists before they turn against her, while the United States hope that some of them could be re-activated in other conflicts, as was earlier the case in Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Chechnya and Kosovo.
Already, certain elements of Daesh have arrived in Kherson (Ukraine), where a so-called «Crimean Government in Exile» already exists.
It is apparent that from the US side, the withdrawal of the Patriot missiles is a trap. Washington would be happy for Russia to reduce the number of active jihadists, but at the same time, it would not be dismayed if it were to get bogged down in Syria. That is why the Russian bear is advancing prudently.
R E L A T E D :
Russia and USA discuss prospects of political settlement in Syria
SANA (Manar al-Frieh/Manal), 28/8/2015 ~ The Russian President’s Special Envoy for the Middle East, Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov discussed on Friday with U.S. Special Envoy for Syria Michael Ratni in Moscow prospects of a political settlement in Syria.
The Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement today that a wide range of issues related to peace efforts in Syria were discussed during the meeting. Counterterrorism efforts, the ministry added, also figured prominently.
The Russian Foreign Ministry has been holding intensive consultations with various Syrian parties and international players on the crisis in Syria since the start of this month.
The Russian President Vladimir Putin reaffirmed on Wednesday Russia’s support for Syria and the importance of building a wide front to combat terrorism with international and regional participation, including Syria.
SANA (H. Zain/ Barry), 27/8/2015 ~ Deputy Speaker of the Russian State Duma Nikolai Levichev reiterated Russia’s firm stances towards Syria.
Member of the Syrian People Assembly Hussein al- Ragheb, in turn, stressed the necessity of the Russian continued support to Syria’s legitimate issue and to the Syrian army and people in the face of terrorism.
SOURCES: Thierry Meyssan, Voltairenet Translation by Pete Kimberley Translations : Deutsch ~ ελληνικά ~ Español ~ فارسى ~ français ~ italiano ~ Português ~ русский Submitted by SyrianPatriots The real SyrianFreePress.NETwork at: https://syrianfreepress.wordpress.com/2015/08/28/russians-in-syria/ Re-publications are welcome, but we kindly ask you, to facilitate the correct information's diffusion, to cite all these original sources.
NOTE: The contents of the articles, speeches or comments on this page are of sole responsibility of their authors. The team and the editorial staff of SyrianFreePress do not necessarily subscribe every point of view expressed and are not responsible for any inaccurate, incorrect or offensive statement in this article. Complaints and corrections (verifiable) will be welcomed and accepted. Copyright owners can notify their claims to us, and the verified contents will be removed.
SCROLL DOWN TO READ OR LEAVE COMMENTS